Our previous article discussed the concept of
California domicile and the application of California community-property rules
to Canadians domiciled in the state. This article is the second installment in
our series explaining how California
community property laws can impact Canadians.
At Cardinal Point, we regularly deal with
cross-border couples who maintain cross-border lifestyles due to career
commitments or other obligations. It’s important to understand how California’s
community property
lawsapply
when one spouse is domiciled in California and the other in Canada.
Imagine a married couple in which the wife lives in
Toronto (and is domiciled in Ontario) and the husband lives in Los Angeles (and
is domiciled in California). Both spouses are dual American and Canadian
citizens and they file a joint U.S. Form 1040 tax return. The husband, Drew, is
a professional hockey player who plays for a California-based NHL team. Drew’s
wife, Amber, is a top fashion model based out of Toronto. The couple owns homes
in both Toronto and Los Angeles. Since Amber is mainly working in Toronto, New
York, London and Paris, she only spends two weeks a year in Los Angeles with
her husband. Moreover, Amber does not earn any California-sourced income.
One might assume that Amber does not need to file a
California tax return and pay California tax, given that she doesn’t earn any
California income and isn’t domiciled in California.
But as we stated in our previous article, California follows its own rules for determining tax residency. Unlike federal tax treatment, an immigrant to California is normally a California resident from the date of arrival. No 183 physical presence test or green card is required to determine California residency status. Moreover, since California is not a party to the Canada-U.S. tax treaty, the treaty is not applicable for purposes of determining California residency (similarly, California does not allow a foreign tax credit or the federal foreign earned income exclusion).
But as we stated in our previous article, California follows its own rules for determining tax residency. Unlike federal tax treatment, an immigrant to California is normally a California resident from the date of arrival. No 183 physical presence test or green card is required to determine California residency status. Moreover, since California is not a party to the Canada-U.S. tax treaty, the treaty is not applicable for purposes of determining California residency (similarly, California does not allow a foreign tax credit or the federal foreign earned income exclusion).
Going back to Drew and Amber, because they are
filing jointly on their federal return, California requires the same joint
filing status on their California return, and they would pay California tax on
their worldwide income.
There is, however, a little-known legal exception
that will allow our imaginary couple to file separately instead of jointly for
California tax purposes. To file separately in California, two criteria must be
met: (1) Amber must not be a resident of California and (2) she must not have
any California-sourced income, including California wages and income from
California real-estate property.
With Amber filing separately under the exception,
she would still need to file a California 540NR non-resident return to pay tax
on 50% of her husband’s California income. That’s because Drew is domiciled in
California. Moreover, she would need to disclose her non-California-sourced
income on the California return to determine her California tax rate.
Because of the complexities facing cross-border couples,
they are well advised to seek out tax advisers who specialize in navigating the
cross-border
tax landscape.
Marc Gedeon is a CPA (U.S), CPA (Canada) and Tax Attorney
at Cardinal Point, a cross-border wealth management organization with offices
in the United States and Canada. Marc specializes in providing
Canada-U.S. cross-border financial, tax, transition, and estate planning
services. www.cardinalpointwealth.com This piece is for informational
purposes only and should not be considered legal or tax advice. Online readers
should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.
No comments:
Post a Comment